![]() |
JRC-CVT Joint Review Committee on Education in Cardiovascular Technology
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
ABOUT ACCREDITATION
Questions:
1.1) What is Accreditation and Why is it Important?
1.2) Why is CAAHEP and the not the Committee on Accreditation the accreditor?
1.3) How Does an Educational Program Become CAAHEP-Accredited?
1.4) Why do both CAAHEP and our committee vote to grant programs accreditation?
Answers:
1.1)
What is Accreditation...and Why is it Important?
[Top]
Accreditation is an effort to assess the quality of institutions, programs and services, measuring them against agreed-upon standards and thereby assuring that they meet those standards.
In the case of
post-secondary education and training, there are two
kinds of accreditation: institutional and
programmatic (or specialized).
Institutional
accreditation helps to assure potential students that
a school is a sound institution and has met certain
minimum standards in terms of administration,
resources, faculty and facilities.
Programmatic (or specialized) accreditation examines specific schools or programs within an educational institution (e.g., the law school, the medical school, the nursing program).
The standards by which these programs are measured have generally been developed by the professionals involved in each discipline and are intended to reflect what a person needs to know and be able to do to function successfully within that profession.
Accreditation in the
health-related disciplines also serves a very
important public interest. Along with certification
and licensure, accreditation is a tool intended to
help assure a well-prepared and qualified workforce
providing health care services.
1.2) Why is CAAHEP and not the Committee on Accreditation the accreditor? [Top]
The simplest answer is
that your committee is a member of CAAHEP for the
purpose of having a
1.3)
How Does an Educational Program Become CAAHEP-Accredited?
[Top]
While there are some
differences among the 18 professions within CAAHEP,
all accredited programs must go through a rigorous
process that has certain elements in common:
1.
Self-Study -the program
does its own analysis of how well it measures up to
the established Standards.
2. On-Site
Evaluation -a team of
"site visitors" travels to the institution to
determine how accurately the self study reflects the
status of the program and to answer any additional
questions that arise. This is a "peer review" process
and often, after the formal part of the site visit is
concluded, team members will share ideas for how a
program can be strengthened or improved.
3.Committee
Review and Recommendation
-the CoA for the specific discipline
will review the report from he site visitors and
develop a recommendation. If there are areas where the
program fails to meet the Standards, these
"deficiencies" will be identified and progress reports
will be requested to assure that each program
continues its efforts to fully comply with all
Standards.
4.CAAHEP Board of Directors -the CAAHEP Board of Directors will then act upon the recommendations forwarded from each CoA, assuring that due process has been met and that Standards are being applied consistently and equitably.
Length of Accreditation Awards
With
the exception of Initial Accreditation, which is for a
period of three years, an award of CAAHEP
1.4)
Why do both CAAHEP and our committee vote to grant
programs accreditation? [Top]
|
|
|||||||||
6 Pine Knoll Dr |
Beverly, Massachusetts 01915-1425 |
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
|